So wrote philosopher Alain de Botton after a poor review of one of his books in the New York Times. The whole sentence was: ‘I will hate you till I die and wish you nothing but ill will in every career move you make.’
This might seem a tad OTT but I know how he feels. A poor review is like a slap in the face to a writer. Death by critic is brutal.
I’ve been lucky so far. The majority of my reviews, in the 14 years I’ve been published, have been favourable. That is until last week when I had this review of Simone’s Website on the Guardian Children’s Book Blog: http://www.guardian.co.uk/childrens-books-site/2012/jan/07/review-simones-website-pielicharty

Ouch! Twitter described the review as: ‘… a smart piece of criticism.’ Well, I was certainly smarting by the end of it, that’s for sure.
Now, everyone knows that the sensible reaction to a bad review is to forget it and move on. ‘Never take any notice of anything people say about your work, good or bad,’the writer Alan Sillitoe once told me. Fair enough. Writers and dramatists have to grown a thick skin in this trade. It’s naive to imagine that everyone on the entire planet is going to like your work; that’s never going to happen.
What I object to (apart from them spelling my name wrong) is that there is no place to respond to the review on the blog. I don’t mean by me - that would be churlish - but for anybody out there who might like to leave another viewpoint.
Also, if I might be so bold, I’d like to pick up on a couple of points:
1. Don’t blame me for the cover
As in: ‘The cover was, quite frankly, rubbish.’
The author has very little say over the cover. The publisher chooses the illustrator and the design. Dislike the cover by all means, just don’t blame the author.
For what it’s worth I agree that the second cover was a little babyish. I prefer the original by Sue Heap (above) and the later one in the Love Simone XXX bind-up by Tim Cahane (below)

2. Please think twice before saying a book is ’badly written’
This is a stab in the heart for any writer; use those dreadful words sparingly. To be a bad writer means the characters are so two-dimensional the reader didn’t care what happened to them at all. It means the sentences are badly constructed and riddled with both grammatical and punctuation errors. It means the dialogue is wooden, cliched and unrealistic. My reviewer wrote that: ‘Simone was a well written character but the fact that she went on a bit was either bad writing or a very strong character.’
Oh, it’s definitely because Simone had ‘a very strong character’. Otherwise it means I spent nine months of my life writing badly. What an idiot that would make me! Not only that, what a fool my editor at Oxford University Press was for not telling me. Sheesh! Sack her immediately. No, let’s go for the strong character option, eh?
3. Please don’t criticise a book if it is too young/ old/graphic / babyish for you when you are NOT the target audience.
‘My advice? Don’t read this book if you are over 11/12 years old. It’s not worth it.’
My advice? Read the age advisory sticker on the back of the book. The Simone series is for 8-11 year olds.
Here endeth the writer’s plea.
Having said all that, writing a good review, whatever your opinion of a book, is a real skill. The young girl is obviously an avid reader and the more of those we have in the world the better. For anyone interested I found this advice on how to write a review that I thought covered all the bases.
I’ll go away and lick my wounds now. A small consolation is the reviewer didn’t like Morris Gleitzman’s ‘Then’ or Andy’ Mulligan’s ‘Trash’ either. I’m in good company.